<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=36514186&amp;blogName=10%2C000+Words+%3A%3A+where+journalism+and+...&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_FTP&amp;navbarType=SILVER&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsearch.google.com%2F&amp;blogLocale=en_US&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.10000words.net%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>
HOME | ABOUT | CONTACT | TWITTER

3 reasons journalists shouldn't use Flash

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

When Flash, the animation authoring software distributed by Adobe, first made its way into the hands of journalists, newsrooms everywhere seized the opportunity to create interactive stories that combined text, photos, audio, and video into one neat package. The novelty of the program led to the use of Flash for everything — even for stories that could be told successfully with just text and pictures — and sometimes requiring staff with no previous experience in design or computer programming to begin learning the program.

That said as wonderful a program as Flash is and despite its limitless possibilities there are several reasons why newsrooms should just say no.


1. Flash projects take a long time to create


When brainstorming how to incorporate Flash into upcoming multimedia projects, many journalists and editors don't take into account how time-consuming it is to build even the most basic Flash project. Whereas with a print story, the writer can simply stop writing at any moment and not include further points or ideas, the process of creating keyframes, tweens, and coding a project takes a significant time to create complete. Flash is only done when it's done.


2. Many projects don't need to be animated


Journalists get excited when they see Flash projects with eye-catching animation and thus are tempted to make everything move, swish, zoom or fly across the screen in their own projects. Journalists should first decide if the multimedia project even needs to be built in the program and that Flash isn't being used just because it's cool. If it is decided that Flash is a great fit for a particular story, the producer should restrain his or herself and not go overboard with animation. At its foundation, a Flash project is still about telling a story.


3. Most journalists are not designers


Flash is okay to use as long as the conventional rules of web design are not ignored. Those who interact with Flash projects expect the layout and navigation to mirror traditional websites with the added bonus of interactivity. Because the average journalist isn't schooled in the fundamentals of design or user interaction, a Flash project should first be sketched or storyboarded by professional designer who is well-versed on how readers interact with visual stories or graphics.


Of course there are many reasons why journalists should use Flash, among them its versatility and its power to draw in the passive user. The following are three multimedia journalism stories that are proof of the power Flash has to bring stories to life.


1. National Geographic: Kingdom of the Blue Whale






2. Las Vegas Sun: Construction Deaths






3. Lainformacion.com: Día de la Música






Also on 10,000 Words:

Where to find the best in Flash journalism
How to save time when using Flash
How did they do that? How to deconstruct websites and Flash files
8 Flash tips and tricks + one big cheat sheet

Labels:


Share This  Bookmark and Share         TwitThis      Subscribe Subscribe to 10,000 Words




7 Comments



Anonymous Will Says:    
AMEN! I preached this all through photojournalism school and to newspapers, and they STILL look at me like I'm crazy. I think there is a much larger argument to be made when you get into the nitty gritty geek aspect of Flash vs Static projects. But I'll save that rant for another time.

July 21, 2009 1:00 PM


Anonymous The Dean Says:    
I agree with these, but there is a 4th that is becoming equally important - Flash does not work on the iPhone. As more people read their news on their phone, prioritizing what information is flash-based becomes even more important.

July 21, 2009 1:33 PM


Blogger Scot Says:    
I also deal with this predilection constantly at a j-school. At this point, my main ambition is to get people to stop creating entire web sites in Flash. Embedded Flash is great, where and when it makes sense to use it. But when it's treated as a way to make entire standalone web sites, things are way off track. And you'd be surprised how prevalent that tendency is.

July 21, 2009 2:19 PM


Blogger vincent Says:    
I was just searching for about this when I discovered your blog post. I’m only visiting to say that I truly enjoyed reading this post, it’s really well written. Are you going to blog more on this? It looks like there’s more material here for more posts.iwc pliot .
iwc others .
iwc portuguese .

July 22, 2009 3:00 AM


Blogger Carlos Gámez Kindelán Says:    
Hi Mark,

thanks for the post!

Here you have a very nice multimedia project i've finded at FWA:

http://www.coldwarkids.com/iveseenenough/

Did you know it?

Best,
Carlos.

July 24, 2009 3:25 AM


Blogger Juan Says:    
So, where can a journalists learn the fundamentals of design and user interactivity?

January 7, 2010 5:24 PM


Add Your Comment





10,000 Words
10,000 Words © Copyright 2007-2010. Subscribe via RSS. Email: info@10000words.net